February 6, 2018
Salvation in Hinduism
Salvation According to Hinduism
by Vijay Chandra
Hinduism is one of the living religions that originated in Southern Asia along with other Hindu sects such as Jainism, Buddhism, and Sikhism. Hinduism, one of the oldest religions in the world today, dates from 3500 B.C. It is the largest religion in India which has a population of 1.5 billion, of which about 90 percent are Hindus. Hinduism is a very powerful religion and has become very fanatical in certain parts of India, calling India for Hindus.
Hinduism is unique among the religions of the world, for it has a system of castes: Brahman [the priestly class]; Kshatriya [the rulers and warriors]; Vaisay [the common agriculturists and artisans]; and the Sudra [the low caste].
Over the centuries the salvation options in Hinduism have varied widely:
Hinduism is a religion without a founder, without a central authority, and without a fixed creed. It is filled with contradictions. Some adherents worship a personified Power of Nature while others worship idols of their local village. It has no uniform moral standard. It changes, yet continues. Hence it is called ‘Sanathan Dharma’ [Eternal Religion].
The concept of salvation in Hinduism also changes and varies in different periods of time. In this article, I will try to survey the teaching of salvation theme from three ways.
The early period of Hinduism:
SALVATION IN THE EARLY PERIODS OF HINDUISM [3500 B.C – 250 A.D].
The ways salvation or the pathway of salvation in Hinduism is unique in each of the early periods of Hinduism which have been classified into:
- The Pre-Vedic Period, 3500 B.C.;
- The Vedic Period, 2000-1000 B.C.;
- The Brahmanic Period 600-250 B.C.;
- Devotional Period [250 B.C -250 AD].
- Trees, animals, goddesses, and Shiva. The way of salvation was not very clear. Actual Hinduism began with Vedic Period. The Hindu Scriptures of these periods are called Vedas of which there are four classifications. The important Veda is the Rig-Veda. The religion in the Vedic- Period was mostly nature worship. Hindus prayed to the personalized powers of nature, such as sun, moon, sky, wind, rain, dawn, earth, air and fire.
- But the idea of sin is present in Vedic religion. Prayers were offered for the forgiveness of sin. To obtain salvation according to the Vedic teaching one had to offer prayers, offerings, and repeat magic formulas to avert the wrath of the offended gods. The chief method of salvation in the Rig Vedic was prayer.
- Ram Mohan Roy [1777-1833] was born in a Bengal family. He was well versed in Bengali, Sanskrit, Persian, Arabic, English and the Hebrew language. He did not accept idol worship. He wrote a book on Jesus, ‘The principles of Jesus: The Guide to Happiness’. He accepted some truths from all other religions [syncretism]. In order to get salvation one has to worship only in a spiritual way instead of resorting to Hindu asceticism, temples and fixed forms of worship.
- Keshab-Chandra- Chandra Sen [1838-1884] became the greatest reformer of Hinduism. He started his own Samji [Society] called the Church of New Dispensation. He tried to organize the conflicting creeds of all religions. The church harmonized reason, faith, Yoga, and bhakti [holiness and social duties] in their highest forms to attain spiritual growth.
- Ramakrishna Paramahamsa [1834-1886] was born in a pious Brahman family. He had no education but became a devotee of Kali. His movement became the most influential of modern movements of Hinduism. His main teaching about religion was that all religions are equally good. His main method of meditation was Samadhi [concentration on God]. According to his teaching, salvation can be obtained through any religion.
- Another important figure in Hindu religion was Swamy Vivekananda [1862-1902]. He was born in a middle call [Kshatriya] warrior family. He became the disciple of Ramakrishna. His main teaching was that no conversion should be attempted because nobody is a sinner [he denied original sin]. To call a man a sinner is a sin. He came to the USA and preached in Chicago. He based his gospel on the doctrine of the identity of the individual soul with Brahma, and so espoused the divinity of man [like Bennie Hinn who says there is a spark of divinity in man so that you are little gods]. Today some preachers are propagating this kind of teaching. And much of ‘New Age’ thinking is drawn from Indian philosophy.
2 comments
Dave This identical article is posted on another website and "written" by a different "author". Which one is the original author and which one has plagiarized? The other website is - https://directionjournal.org/23/1/salvation-according-to-hinduism.htmlJerry Dear Dave, You raise a most important issue: who wrote this article? Unfortunately, Vijay Chandra passed away earlier this year in July while in Fiji. I am no longer able to ask him about the article he submitted to me or to ask him about its sources. I have taught English for nearly four decades, and one of the things I strictly taught my students was to absolutely avoid plagiarism. In the over thirty articles Vijay Chandra has submitted to me I have noticed he identifies his sources quite faithfully. You will note that the early January 2018 article by Vijay Chandra included on this site is taken from a scholarly journal by his permission as the copyright holder, and I carefully identified the place where the original article is found. But I must admit, the wording of the article included here under Vijay Chandra's name is too close in wording and structure to be by both authors independently! Vijay Chandra was himself raised in the Hindu faith before he became a Christian. As a Christian, he has served as a missionary in his home country for over forty years. He founded a church there. He taught Bible, theology, Hebrew and Greek at a seminary or Bible school there. Vijay Chandra obtained his advanced theological education here in the United States of America where he studied under Dr. Robert Morey, in whose apologetics journal the article I mentioned that Vijay wrote appeared. I wish we had learned of this apparent instance of plagiarism a few months ago so I could then have directed this question to him. As it stands, I guess we will have to wait until we get to heaven to ask him. Were I to pass judgment on the matter just now, the 1994 article in the Mennonite journal you reference is most likely the original article, but how Vijay made the mistake of submitting it to me without acknowledging his source is a mystery. Thank you for alerting me to this matter.
